CASE STUDY ON EK RUKA HUA FAISLA

The need for recognition The prestige which is availed by being in a group Benefits that can be acquired from the group Cohesiveness in a group satisfies the needs of the members in that group. We also learn that every decision should be based on reasonable evidence and it can be dangerousto rush to conclusions. Norms are developed as a result of the interaction between the group members. As a whole all of these are important for exerting social influence on the members of the group. A time element is involved in developing the productivity of the group but time alone cannot bring about the desired level of productivity in the group.

The storming stage has started but norming is also simultaneously taking place. A group development is basically concerned with the process of progress achieved by a group over a period of time and how the relationship between the members of the group is changing. Influence of the group members over each other Satisfaction from the group Perseverance for the attainment of the goals Goal attainment Apart from the positive outcomes cohesion has negative effects also. A few in the room have “don’t care” type of attitude, who just happened to be there on the Jury. The movie ek ruka hua faisla occurs in a single room, the jury room where the twelve jurors have assembled together to deliberate on charges of murder against a young boy accused of killing his elderly father. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here

Two subgroups are formed in the jury group; one is the majority group and the other the minority group.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

He is a smart guy who based his decisions on hardcore facts anddemonstrates an active constructive personality. Juror 11 Shailendra Goel: The ln against the boy looks certain and strong, as there is a witness in the form of an old man who claims to have heard the incident and another woman who claims to have seen the actual act of murdering.

It helps in avoiding excessive conflicts and ultimately the disintegration of the whole group. A main change that occurs during this stage is the emergence of a sense dtudy unity in the group.

  MS THESIS FORMAT COMSATS

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

He is traditional by thinking. They have some prejudices and they want to stick to it. And the dominance and deviations from the norms by juror 3 and juror 10, results in lot of disruptions and conflicts and also the members becoming personal for example juror 5 gets aggressive when juror talks ill of the slum dwellers and also juror 6 Hemant Mishrawho actually plays a secondary role in the movie, gets aggressive when juror guka shouts at juror 9, the old man.

K Raina is not convinced that the boy is guilty and he starts the deliberations by giving an explanation that it is about the life of that boy and the conclusion should not be derived without resorting to any discussion. This stage can actually be called as conflict stage. Hence we can see many of the members throughout the course of the movie deviating from the norms and beliefs. Middle status and high status members adhere to norms to maintain or to elevate their status in the group. Influence of the group members over each other Satisfaction from the group Perseverance for the attainment of the goals Goal attainment Apart from the positive outcomes cohesion has negative effects also.

Effects of cohesion on the group:. His part in the om is affronted by the Juror 3. These are the few components of group dynamics.

For some time it seems that group cannot go forward but again the group comes into performing stage with the wise intervention of juror 9 and the discussions jua and nearing the end of discussions all the members vote in favour of the group stufy one, juror 3 and finally studj personal bias surfaces. His bitter experience with his son has led him to this strong bias against the boy under trial.

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

Twelve Angry men an Analytical essay. There are many dimensions to the group cohesion. Only one juror is unconvinced of the boys involvement inthe crime resulting in a difference in opinion and further discussion on the case.

  PCRA ESSAY COMPETITION RESULTS 2015

case study on ek ruka hua faisla

Norms of the group and the roles adorned by the group members promote social integration. These conflicts occur when there is a difference between information, beliefs, values interest desires etc.

Characteristics of 12 Jurors in the movie: Click here to sign up. His decision style is again a mix of a charismatic and a follower. Initially the jurors as they enter into the jury room, in which they are supposed stay till the jury session completes, they try to get to know each other and everybody is nice to each other. Initially a four stage model was devised which was later revised by Tuckman and Mary Ann Stufy Jensen in into a five stage model. In the first three types leader plays the major role and structures the patterns.

The Best Way to demonstrate Group Process – Ek Ruka hua Faisla () – Affable Discourses

Since he comes from a similarbackground, he is in a better position to understand the accused situations and empathize with him. Email required Address never made public. The need for recognition The prestige which is availed by being in a group Benefits that can be acquired from the group Cohesiveness in a group satisfies the needs of the members in that group.

The group culture has a prominent role in achieving the goals as well as satisfying the socio-emotional needs of the members. There are also a few who have good analytical skills and have conjured up lots of facts and data. By Jonathan Clough and Jacqueline Horan.

Eventhough juror 8 exhibits leadership qualities and he cannot be called as leader but it is he who carries the group forward.