The termination of the DDIG program will have long-lasting adverse consequences to the intellectual development of young scientists in ecology, evolution, and organismal biology. Dina Navon Say, for example, you found a gene that you thought was important in building fish fins. Risks and rewards in graduate research. How to contact the news team. Eavesdropping in the Animal Kingdom: DDIGs have typically been lauded as having a high return-on-investment, and the loss of the biology DDIG program has sparked dismay across the board.
Dunn worries that ending the DDIG program could have a negative impact across the entire field of biology. DDIGs are a strategic investment in the future of our fields, contributing to the development of independent research skills in the junior cohorts who will be the next innovators. DDIGs are one of the most prestigious grants a graduate student can apply for. Standing on the shoulders of giants Tails from the Field: One idea being floated would have professional societies manage the DDIG peer review through a grant from NSF, which would continue funding the actual dissertation projects. But Adams worries that losing the NSF imprimatur could reduce their value. The agency said managing the program had become too labor intensive and was making it harder for program officers to do other parts of their job.
The lost plains of Doggerland emerge from the North Sea May. DDIGs are one of the most prestigious (ddiy) a graduate student can apply for. The DDIG program is a very important investment in the scientific future of the country. Now, that project may not see the light of day due to lack of resources. Representing the thousands of members in our respective societies, we offer to help find solutions to support the DDIG program and maintain a sound, directorare responsible, and efficient program in support of student research.
The National Science Foundation, one of the premier organizations that funds basic scientific research in the United States, faces major budget cuts under the current administration.
These are all essential skills that represent the essence of our goals for training th in our fields.
Ecologists protest sudden end of NSF dissertation grants | Science | AAAS
The oceans contain nearlykinds of viruses Apr. Say, for example, you found a gene that you thought was important in building fish fins. Hopi Hoekstra, an evolutionary biologist at Harvard University, says that applying for a DDIG is practically a rite of passage in her lab.
Science 17 May VolIssue USDA Flickr The National Science Foundation, one of the premier organizations that funds basic scientific research in the United States, faces major budget cuts under the current administration. Risks and rewards in graduate research. Dunn worries that ending the DDIG program could have a negative impact across the entire field of biology. I had big plans for this post.
Upcoming Meetings Past Biologicao. With a fiscal storm brewing—the budget submitted last month by President Donald Trump proposes an Dina Navon Say, for sciencez, you found a gene that you thought was important in building fish fins. In light of that, the NSF recently announced that its Directorate of Biological Sciences will no longer be funding Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants DDIGsciting a high administrative cost relative to award amount as a major reason for the cut.
Scientific societies banded together or worked independently to urge the NSF to reconsider, even explicitly addressing strategies for reducing the administrative burdens placed on the NSF by the DDIG programs. Without the DDIG program, the junior members of our societies and in related fields will be denied valuable opportunities for ij intellectual and professional development.
In the first few weeks after the notice, DDIGStory trended on Twitter, allowing DDIG alums from different stages of their careers to share their stories of how this grant impacted their lives immeasurably for the better.
NSF Cuts PhD Training Grant
Senior managers in improvmeent biology directorate said they terminated the program reluctantly, with the hope that it will ease a growing workload on program officers in the two divisions—environmental biology DEB and integrated organismal systems IOS —now offering them. But Adams worries that losing the NSF imprimatur could reduce their value. You can publish those data as is, and they will fit into your dissertation.
Something had to give, they concluded, and the ax fell on DDIGs. In a letter yesterday to directorate officialsthe 10,member Ecological Society of America, based in Washington, D.
At the (ddiv) time, they acknowledge that the additional work stems in part from insufficient resources. The termination of the DDIG program will have long-lasting adverse consequences to the intellectual development of young scientists in ecology, evolution, and organismal biology.
Trickle-Down Academics – Facing the Loss of the NSF DDIG in Biology
This bird lost the ability to fly twice on the same island, thousands of years apart May. Learning about the mechanism of genetic changes provides insight about the nature of molecular evolution, as well as more specific target regions for gene therapies tailored to a congenital disease that is also associated with this gene. Grants that do receive funding may not receive full funding. Having their own financial resources permits students to prioritize their research goals and invest in directions they find most promising, directly supporting the development of scientific creativity and leadership for the future of the country.
They traditionally fund exciting side projects that are not central to the dissertation but would substantially improve its value. When you increase the activity of that gene, you see bigger fins regardless of speciesand when you decrease its activity, you see smaller fins. Perfectly interesting, if not exactly earth-shattering. The time needed to manage the DDIGs has impinged on the other things program officers are expected to do, say NSF senior managers, including staying abreast of developments in their field, developing new research initiatives, and remaining active scientists.