Open Preview See a Problem? Given this, the position the publisher takes in court, and in the world at large, during times of legal assault by conservatives or fanatics is crucial in three ways: Directories Courses Discussion Groups. The author is Editor and Publisher, Permanent Black. Now this is very much within the Buddhist tradition of origin myths and is really making a statement about the superior status of Ram and Sita, which has been completely misinterpreted by the uneducated, who go around screaming and shouting at all of us who mention this version because it talks about Ram and Sita ruling as consorts.
The following sources provide more information on the arguments against the inclusion of the essay in the curriculum:. In , political activists of the Hindu Right vandalised the History Department in protest against this essay. Ramanujan discusses several versions, including the Valmiki Ramayana and the Kamba Ramayana, both of which seem to have problematic elements for Hindu fanatics. This valuable essay is being made available here at sacw. There are two distinct traditions within the Jaina Ramakathas, and although Ramanujan does not directly refer to this himself, I extend his assertion that there is no one text that can be upheld for even the counter narrative. Now if Ramanujan had been alive and the University had a campus in Delhi, and this had happened, as is perfectly feasible, what would have been the reaction?
The 16 Dec Massacre in a Peshawar school – statements from human rights groups, media commentary and editorials Fast Track to Troubling Times: We should recall that the opposition to the essay had initially come from a small group of activists of a Hindu fundamentalist organisation, who vandalised the History department and even assaulted a member of the faculty when the essay was included in the course.
Three Hundred Ramayanas – Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation
Do you think there needs to be any kind of leeway given because of that? If the OUP were on sale, even Rupert Murdoch would have to check with his bank if he had the money to buy it. Therefore, any attempt to invoke the various versions of the epic militates against this ideological project and political interest. By continuing past this page, you agree to abide by these terms.
So the expert opinion again did not think it was necessary to withdraw the essay.
This exhibition was disfigured essaj those involved in its organisation were assaulted by the members of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. To say this, even implicitly, can enormously injure a publishing reputation. The combination of these two factors provided the context for the agitation and the consequent decision of the Delhi University.
And what this initial action and the reaction of the University raise are the question whether courses and syllabi can be changed by groups beating up faculty and vandalising departments. Thus, rajayanas Tamil Kamban in the 12th century CE weaves in the tapestry of bhakti, unquestioning devotion that ties the bhakta, even a fallen one at that, ramayaans the god in keeping with the Tamil alvar traditions of venerating Rama as the saviour of all and as the embodiment of grace.
Open Preview See a Problem? But this end brings home to Hanuman, the ever faithful bhakta of Rama, that there is no one Rama, there are many Ramas, and no single Ramayana but many Ramayanas. Read More, Spend Less. I have only looked at the course outline just now, which has tjree themes relating to diverse topics such as material cultures, classical Sanskrit, folk and popular literary traditions and on icons and artisans, a course eminently teachable and reflexive.
Recall the withdrawal of Rohinton Mistry’s highly acclaimed book Such a Long Journey by Bombay University, as a result of ramanujxns agitation by the grandson of Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray on the plea that it injured the Maratha sentiments.
A brief foray into publishing history shows a consistency in their response pattern when assaulted by numbskull vice-chancellors and their ilk. Subversions and inversions, contestations and rebuttals abound—was Ravana indeed the evil demonic figure of the brahmanical imagination; did the rakshasas actually gorge on flesh and blood; was it the lust of Ravana that led to his ruin?
So as a broader issue, isn’t the interdisciplinary approach a good thing? The number of offended Indians is legion, and growing by the day, and many of these bleeding-heart illiberals can reach an arrangement with a sub-judge on the need for self-publicizing litigation against any publisher whose size suggests a generous settlement out of court.
History Honours course was a political decision. Are the issues involved in it similar to the Delhi University case? Ramanujan carefully compares Thai, Malaysian and South East Asian tellings of Ramayana on the basis of linguistic studies and geopolitical routes through which the ithihasa reached orally, and the culture it got assimilated into.
The DU authorities, it is alleged, decided on this issue in favour of the dissenting opinion without consulting the larger community, when in fact this item was not even on the agenda.
Ramanujan’s Three Hundred Ramayanas: Transmission, Interpretation And () – Mainstream Weekly
The question of folk traditions of the Ramayana are more difficult to address because we move into a different realm, from the written text to orality. See some reactions in the Indian media below to Oxford University Press’ response.
In the second tradition, in addition to countering, the narrative seeks to provide some alternate views as well. Such incidents are happening all over the country. Mar 18, Jerry Jose rated it it was amazing.
Although in theory publishers indemnify themselves against litigation costs in their contracts with authors, in practice it is they more than the author who are answerable in court.
The following are some of the sources that discuss the implications of the removal of the essay from the curriculum:. It is common knowledge that Renaissance and Reformation in Europe cannot be made intelligible without explaining the practices of the medieval Church. Romila Thaparthe foremost authority on early Indian history, spoke to Priscilla Jebaraj about the decision, its adverse consequences for scholarship and knowledge, and the efforts by vested interests to project one version of Hindu cultural heritage and religious tradition over all others.
Which version are they supporting?